September 4, 2010

Is open source software more vulnerable to malicious attacks than proprietary software?

I’ve seen claims that Ubuntu is more secure than Windows. How can this be the case if anyone is allowed to see and edit the source code?

Share and Enjoy:
  • RSS
  • email
  • Add to favorites
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • blogmarks
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Technorati

Filed under Uncategorized by

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Comments on Is open source software more vulnerable to malicious attacks than proprietary software? »

September 4, 2010

???? ????? @ 4:46 am

The open source nature of an o/s provides a superior vehicle to making security vulnerabilities easier to spot and fix, not only because more people can look at it, but more importantly, because the model forces people to write more clear code, and to adhere to standards. This in turn facilitates security reviews and solves the issue on a core level. Open source software projects can be more secure than closed source projects. However, the very things that can make open source programs secure such as the availability of the source code, and the fact that large numbers of users are available to look for and fix security holes and exploits can also lull people into a false sense of security. Security consciousness is really up to the end user.

Leave a Comment

Fields marked by an asterisk (*) are required.

*

Rss Feed Tweeter button Facebook button Technorati button Reddit button Myspace button Webonews button Delicious button Digg button Stumbleupon button
All trademarks and copyrights owned by their respective owners and are used for illustration only
Kokopelli Creative Web Design
kepolesen1,kepolesen1,kepolesen1,kepolesen1,oguyannsea1,oguyannsea1,igele1,oguyannsea1,igele1,oguyannsea1,oguyannsea1,kepolesen1,kepolesen1,igele1,igele1,