June 29, 2007
FSF celebrates release of GPLv3
Filed under Open Source News by StoneLion
Red Hat is a company that is easy to dislike.
Maybe it’s the relationship with IBM. Maybe it’s the way they absorbed JBOSS. Maybe it’s CEO Matthew Szulik, or the proprietary way in which the company operates.
Maybe it’s because they’re based in Raleigh, North Carolina, and don’t schmooze the Silicon Valley press corps, which has something in common with that of Washington, D.C.
Whatever, I think it’s time we got off Red Hat’s case. The company delivered another solid quarter yesterday, helped out by channel partners and bigger JBOSS subscription sales.
The company probably goosed those JBOSS sales further with its acquisition of MetaMatrix, which specializes in metadata and data services. That sale closed this week.
Red Hat is never going to be Mr. Pinstripe Suit, Mr. hi-dee-hi-dee-ho. They don’t roll that way in Raleigh. But it’s a solid Linux vendor, in the center of the enterprise space, it continues to grow, it does its bit for the open source movement, and maybe that’s enough.
What else do you expect from them?
Filed under Open Source News by Dana Blankenhorn
June 28, 2007
Day one at the Ottawa Linux Symposium
Filed under Open Source News by jzb
June 27, 2007
New OSI Physical Mailing Address
For a variety of reasons (mostly having to do with the vagaries of Post Office administration in Noe Valley), OSI has a new official mailing address as of today...
If you want to send us donation checks (or snail mail of any kind)...henceforth please send to:
Danese Cooper, Treasurer
Open Source Initiative
P.O. Box 410990, #256
San Francisco, California 94114-0990
Sincere apologies to anyone whose mail may have been caught in the crossfire of our mail box battle. Please resend.
Filed under Open Source Blogs by danese
June 26, 2007
Pro-competition, not Anti-business
I started to respond to David Richards (the CEO of CentricCRM) comment to the thread I started last week, but that thread has generated a number of sub-threads which I think are better addressed separately. (You can be the judge as to whether this thread separation is a good idea or not.) Thus, I gave a partial response there, and here's really my full response.
David,
First, let me thank you for stepping forward into this discussion.
Filed under Open Source Blogs by Michael Tiemann

